Why Lisa Vanderpump didn’t fire Max Boyens, Brett Caprioni over resurfaced racist tweets

Don’t question Lisa Vanderpump.

The “Vanderpump Rules” boss, 59, defended her decision to keep Max Boyens and Brett Caprioni employed at her restaurants after the resurfacing of racist tweets, during the show’s virtual reunion that aired Tuesday.

Jax Taylor brought up Boyens’ past racist tweets while defending his decision to hire and fire a homophobic pastor, telling Tom Sandoval, a minority owner of TomTom, “I don’t understand why you need to make a big production out of it considering what your manager’s done.”

“The only reason why you said s–t is not because you give a f–k about racial equality, it’s to f—ng deflect from your s—t,” Sandoval yelled back before Vanderpump stepped in.

“Firstly, as a 5 percent shareholder, he wouldn’t have the right to terminate his employment,” she asserted. Addressing the rest of the cast she added, “If I fired every one of you that have made mistakes, it doesn’t matter to what degree, probably none of you would have a job.”

She added later on, “I have never seen any inkling of anything that would make me believe that that’s the beliefs they’re holding now,” she said. “And if I had, they wouldn’t be working for me.”

Vanderpump previously condemned their tweets to Page Six in January, saying that she did “not condone any of the heinous comments made in the past.”

“I am glad they understand the severity of their offenses and have shown utmost remorse and contrition,” she added. “I embrace a community of diversity and do not tolerate bigotry of any form within my workplace. Max and Brett are both appropriately ashamed of their past obnoxious teenage arrogance and casual use of unacceptable terms. While both have now matured as adults, they have shown remorse for their prior reckless defamatory statements.”

Boyens previously apologized in January after an old tweet reading “It upsets me that the word n—a is not allowed to be said unless you are black because quite honestly it’s my favorite word” surfaced.

“Theres this girl I see [email protected], she looks like the girl from the movie precious& I’m not just saying this cuz she’s big and black,” another stated.

A third tweet read, “Something about Asians that just makes me want to punch them in the suck hole.”

“I want to sincerely apologize for what I tweeted in 2012 — it was wrong on every level,” he said in a statement at the time. “It is not a representation of who I am. I am shocked I ever tweeted that — and I am disgusted and embarrassed — I am truly sorry.”

He emphasized his apology during the reunion, adding that his grandfather who “pretty much raised” him is black and his mother is biracial.

“I’m an adult now, and I cringe even thinking that I said those things,” he said. “We live in a generation now where saying some things, even if you are of that culture, is just frowned upon. I just want to say I’m just really, sincerely sorry. I’m not even — there’s no excuse.”

Meanwhile, Caprioni apologized after he used racial slurs on Twitter as well.

“I want to express my deepest apologies for the insensitive, ignorant, and hurtful comments I made,” Caprioni stated. “I am incredibly ashamed and accept full responsibility, and acknowledge that this language was as unacceptable then as it is now. Please know that I have learned and grown since then and would never use this language today. From the bottom of my heart, I am truly sorry.”

He also emphasized his apology and added during reunion, “It wasn’t okay then, it’s not okay now. It’s something I regret deeply, and it was just kind of making jokes with each other, like we’d literally be in the same room and just say stupid s— to each other, and it was a dumb f—ing thing to do. I’m doing my best to move forward and be the best person I can be, and try to emulate that to everybody else.”

The virtual reunion was taped before the death of George Floyd while in police custody and the nationwide protests against racism and police brutality.

Source: Read Full Article

If protesters can march, why can’t businesses open?

Remember COVID-19? Owners of small businesses that have yet to open but are in danger of being smashed by rioters sure do.

As Mayor Bill de Blasio and Gov. Andrew Cuomo take turns making vague comments about the continued destruction, many small-business owners caught in limbo are asking: Why are crowds OK for protest but not anything else? Our fearful leaders have no answer.

New York City is still a full five days away from entering Phase 1. This will open up only some industries, like construction and manufacturing and retail on a pickup basis only.

Many business owners are wondering if they’ll have a business left to open when their turn finally comes.

Few business owners I spoke to would let me use their name or the name of their business. Several told me they’re afraid of retaliation by a government that has full control of their fate. They feel that criticizing any part of the reopen plan can have them targeted for shutdown when they do get to open.

An owner of a chain of pre-schools that regularly provide services to over 500 families across the city told me how impossible it’s been to get a clear answer from the state about the future of his business.

“We have waited weeks to hear from state and local officials and no one can provide clear guidance. We’ve had teams that have been put in place to assess the situation from Day 1, and the fact that there is little to no solid information presented to small businesses so we may begin to transform to the new norm is disheartening, to say the least.”

With “education” sandwiched in with Broadway shows and concerts in Phase 4, and so many day camps closed for the season because permission from Cuomo to open came too late, it’s impossible to tell when parents will be able to get any kind of child care.

Many other business owners I spoke to were unclear how they will reopen if their kids have nowhere to go.

Others wondered how, even after we fully reopen, their businesses could function with the strict guidelines in place.

A jewelry store owner in Midtown told me she’s not sure how a jewelry store can allow customers inside with masks. The curbside pickup finally allowed in Phase 1 won’t make a difference to many retailers either.

Sarale Giter, a hairstylist in Brooklyn, was one of the few to let me use her real name. She is one of the founders of the group Reopen NY, dedicated to helping small businesses reopen.

Giter told me, “If you can give blessings to protesters who are exercising their right to protest without social distancing, then surely we can be free to practice our right to conduct business in a safe and social distanced manner with masks and sanitizing.”

The protests have exposed the absurdity of the continued lockdowns. It’s either a public-health emergency and crowds must be stopped or it’s not. It cannot be both.

On Sunday, as protests continued in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, a video circulated online of a city sheriff just a few avenues away giving tickets to open stores on 13th Avenue in Brooklyn.

None of this makes any sense anymore. The jig is up, the lockdown is over, our elected officials just need to catch up.

The unrest in our streets is undeniably tied to people being locked in their homes indefinitely, many with no jobs to return to. There’s a reason the protests are hitting so hard in New York City, nowhere near Minneapolis, the actual site of George Floyd’s killing, and that’s because we remain in this perpetual lockdown with hardly an end in sight.

We need to get to a better place as a city, and to do that we need to go back to work.

Dani Zolden and James Altucher own the comedy club Stand Up New York. On Sunday the club put on a socially distanced show on the sidewalk outside. Altucher told me, “We just wanted to get people laughing again. The comedians were great. The audience was having a fun time and doing proper social distancing and wearing masks. And then we were shut down about 20 minutes before the show would’ve ended anyway.”

We all need to laugh again. Our politicians need to let us.

Twitter: @Karol

Source: Read Full Article

What is the K number and why could it be crucial as coronavirus lockdown eases? – The Sun

THE R rate, also known as the reproduction number, has been crucial to the Government's understanding of the threat Covid-19 poses.

But now experts have now revealed that another value is becoming increasingly important amid the coronavirus pandemic: the K number.

⚠️ Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates

And scientists believe it will be key for fighting a second wave of the disease – as the Government slowly begins easing lockdown measures.

But what exactly is the K value and what does it mean for Covid-19?

What is K?

While the R rate tells us the rate of transmission of coronavirus, the K value looks at how much variation there is in transmission.

It's a statistical value the can help shed light on different transmission rates.

The R rate is an average – for coronavirus at it's height each patient passed the bug on to an average of three other people. Now, after lockdown that number is between 0.7 and 0.9.

But the K value takes into account that not everyone will pass on the virus at the same speed, and not every environment poses a risk to mass spread of the bug.

If the K figure is close to one, as with influenza, a virus will move relatively evenly through the population without variation.

Dr Adam Kucharski, an expert in the dynamics of infectious diseases at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), told The Guardian: “Once K is above about five or ten it tells you most people are generating pretty similar numbers [of secondary cases], you are not getting these super-spreading events.

"Once K is below one, you have got the potential for super-spreading.”


What does it mean for Covid-19?

In the case of Covid-19, the K is believed to be 0.1 to 0.5 per cent, according to Dr Kucharski and his team at LSHTM.

Their findings suggest the majority of secondary transmission may be caused by a very small fraction of individuals.

In other words, this could mean ten per cent of Covid patients pass on 80 per cent of infections – these people may be called 'super spreaders'.

The other 90 per cent of individuals don't actually spread it to many other people – and are behind the remaining 20 per cent of coronavirus transmission.

It's not just the average amount of transmission, it is also the amount of variation

This has huge implications for Governments trying to ease restrictions but avoid a second wave of infections.

“It could be that you have a lot of cases that crop up and don’t infect anybody and you have one case who goes to a particular environment, or particular workplace, and sparks a very large outbreak,” Dr Kucharski told The Times.

R, which the Government is trying to keep below one, was important when the pandemic was at its peak.

However, Dr Kucharski said now "it's not just the average amount of transmission, it is also the amount of variation."

To put it another way, super-spreading matters – a reality highlighted by reports including one from South Korea where one individual is thought to have infected dozens of others by attending church.

How might the relaxation of the lockdown affect K?

Lockdown lowers the risk of a single infectious person spreading the virus to other individuals.

Dr Kucharski said: “Obviously if you start to allow larger gatherings, have larger workplaces, if you have other types of interaction starting, then that does increase the chance that one infection could spread to more people than it would have been able to a couple of weeks ago.

"It could decrease the K, but it could also increase the R."

The effect of easing lockdown measures on K can be seen in other countries in Asia and Europe that have begun to open schools, shops, bars and restaurants.

Instead of widespread infection, they have had flare-ups where individuals spread it to large numbers of people during a single encounter, for example in a South Korean club or French, German or Dutch abattoirs.

Dr Kucharski said if a handful of events generate most of an outbreak, then if you can find a way of identifying where and when those events are happening then that reduces far more of your transmission than if you were just trying to follow up every case as if they were the same.

He added: "The difficulty is you have to predict where these ‘superspreading events’ happen."

CORONAVIRUS CRISIS – STAY IN THE KNOW

Don't miss the latest news and figures – and essential advice for you and your family.

To receive The Sun's Coronavirus newsletter in your inbox every tea time, sign up here.
To follow us on Facebook, simply 'Like' our Coronavirus page.
Get Britain's best-selling newspaper delivered to your smartphone or tablet each day – find out more.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop Once Got Called Out By NASA

Actress GwynethPaltrow is known for her roles in Seven (1995), A Perfect Murder (1998),and Shakespeare In Love (1998). She also plays Pepper Potts in the MarvelCinematic Universe.

However, these days, it is not just her acting career thatpeople are paying attention to. Her lifestyle business, Goop, has been growingever since it was first launched in 2008. Although Paltrow has been making alot of money thanks to Goop, the company has been criticized by many fans andexperts. Even NASA once called out Paltrow for a Goop product she waspromoting.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop has beenknown to be a controversial brand

Goop started out as a place for Paltrow to make recommendations for other women concerning, beauty, fashion, travel, and fitness. Nowadays, Goop continues to do just that but has since added an e-commerce section as well. Goop’s website sells both Goop-branded products alongside those from other companies.

However, Goop has been a subject of much criticism. For instance, the products Paltrow promotes on Goop’s website are often not affordable for the average American. This has caused Paltrow to be labeled as a celebrity who is out-of-touch with most of the country, and many folks even question who exactly her brand is targeting.

Additionally, health experts also criticize Goop for promoting pseudoscience. Her pricey products have been known to tout health benefits that do not have scientific backings. Gynecologist Dr. Jen Gunter once reviewed a many Goop products and found “of 110 products that made health claims or could be considered a health-related product only 10 had any kind of valid claim, meaning 10% of products were not pseudoscience.”

Why NASA once called out GwynethPaltrow and Goop

RELATED: 3 Goop Products More Controversial Than Gwyneth Paltrow’s Vagina-Scented Candle

In 2017, Paltrow found herself on NASA’s radar when aproduct called “Body Vibes” was being promoted on Goop. The product was asticker that claimed to use “the same conductive carbon material NASA uses toline space suits” to “rebalance the energy frequency in our bodies.”

However, a representative from NASA shut down the claims made by Goop. One person told Gizmodo NASA does not “have any conductive carbon material lining the spacesuits.”

Meanwhile, Mark Shelhamer, former chief scientist at NASA’shuman research division, simply said: “Wow, what a load of BS this is.”

How does Gwyneth Paltrow feelabout all her critics?

RELATED: Even During a Pandemic, Gwyneth Paltrow Can’t Escape Trolling

Although Paltrow has found herself inhot water numerous times over the products promoted on Goop’s website, itdoes not seem like she is shutting down her brand anytime soon.

In response to all the criticism she receives, Paltrow once toldTown& Country: “It doesn’t mean anything to me, because it’s not about me. It’sabout what I represent, and that’s about you.”

“You can keep resisting it, but I’m on the right side ofthis,” she added. “I’m watching the market. I’m watching what’s happening. Ithink what this wellness movement is really about is listening to yourself,tuning into what interests you, and trying things.”

Source: Read Full Article

Why the yellow paper hearts have given grieving families some comfort

Yellow hearts to remember our loved ones: Grieving families say campaign set up in memory of a grandmother who died of COVID-19 reminds people their lost relatives are ‘more than a statistic’

  • Yellow hearts are appearing in some windows in Britain for sobering reasons
  • Each heart represents one of the 37,460 victims lost to coronavirus in the UK
  • Here five families tell JILL FOSTER why this simple but poignant emblem has given them some comfort in their grief 
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

Pictures of rainbows have become a familiar sight in the windows of Britain’s homes in recent months in thanks to the NHS. But now, yellow paper hearts are also appearing in some windows – and the reasons are altogether more sobering.

Each heart represents one of the 37,460 victims lost to coronavirus. The movement, Yellow Hearts To Remember, was set up by a family who lost their beloved grandmother to the virus last month. Now, it has over 5,500 members, each sharing their own personal story of loss.

Here five families tell JILL FOSTER why this simple but poignant emblem has given them some comfort in their grief…

WE CREATED THIS GROUP – BUT NOW IT BELONGS TO EVERYONE

Sheila Gompertz, a computer scientist from Birmingham, died on April 12 aged 83. Her husband of 59 years, David, 84, a retired medical scientist says:

Sheila was a very bright, intelligent lady who wore it lightly. She had a Masters Degree in computing sciences as well as a Royal Horticultural Society certificate. People would come to our house not to say hello to me but to see Sheila’s garden. She knew all the Latin names of every plant and flower.

Sheila Gompertz, a computer scientist from Birmingham, died on April 12 aged 83. She is pictured with her husband of 59 years, David, 84, a retired medical scientist 

Yellow paper hearts are appearing in windows to represent the death of someone fro the home

But about six years ago she developed dementia and we moved to Birmingham to be nearer to my son, a respiratory consultant who is currently working on a COVID ward. We had a carer for a while but Sheila needed round the clock care, so 13 months ago we found a wonderful care home not far from our home.

Until lockdown I was visiting her every other day. I don’t know if she still knew who I was. We would sit together and she would cuddle my arm, so she knew I ‘belonged’ to her in some way.

The first I knew that she was ill was when the care home called me to say the paramedics were with her. My son was the only one who was allowed to see her and she died three days later. I couldn’t speak to her on the telephone or see her. There was no point as she wouldn’t have understood what was going on.

The idea for the Yellow Hearts was a joint one between myself and my very talented grandchildren. I had remembered the yellow ribbons from the Vietnam War and suggested we do something similar for those people who have died from the virus. Like so many people, I listen to the Downing Street briefings every day where they reel off the numbers and parrot the phrase: ‘These are all individual stories’ but that’s no good. People need a place where they can express their loss and tell people about their loved ones. We also need to show on a local level how many people this is affecting personally.

Sheila was a very bright, intelligent lady who wore it lightly. She had a Masters Degree in computing sciences as well as a Royal Horticultural Society certificate, her widower says

Sheila’s granddaughter Hannah Gompertz created the yellow heart group on Facebook

My granddaughter Hannah said that no one could buy yellow ribbon right now but we all have crayons and paper so perhaps we could draw hearts and put them in our windows instead. She and my granddaughter Becky had the idea to set up the Facebook group Yellow Hearts To Remember and it’s taken off. We’ve filled a hole everyone needed – a place where people can tell the stories of their nearest and dearest. Sadly there are thousands of people who have now posted their tributes.

That Facebook group doesn’t belong to us anymore but to the people who have contributed. I keep reading their stories of loss and I weep for them because they are devastating. But so many have come forward to thank us for setting it up. I do think it’s helping people know they’re not alone.

IT’S VITAL TO SHOW OTHER FAMILIES THEY’RE NOT ALONE

Hefin Williams, 80 and wife Valerie, 74, from Warrington died less than a fortnight apart. They leave four children, six grandchildren aged nine to 22. Here, daughter Nikki, 46, a neonatal nurse says:

COVID-19 is a thief. It has not only stolen our wonderful parents but it’s stolen time from us being together as a family to grieve. It’s horrific.

Mum and Dad still had years ahead of them. Dad had celebrated his 80th last year but they were so full of life and loved by everyone. Dad volunteered at the local hospital and mum had only just retired from her job as a carer. They enjoyed eating out, going to the theatre, dancing. Unbeknown to us, it may have been their downfall but we have no idea where they picked up the virus.


Hefin Williams, 80 and wife Valerie, 74, from Warrington died less than a fortnight apart. They leave four children, six grandchildren aged nine to 22

Nikki William’s now has a rainbow to thank the NHS and yellow hearts for both of her parents

Mum became ill first. She had no underlying health conditions but developed a dry cough and high temperature and was taken to hospital when her breathing became difficult. She was placed on a ventilator and it broke our hearts that Dad was left alone because they did absolutely everything together. But within a week, we had to call 999 for Dad too and the last time I saw him was in the ambulance. He died on March 30.

At his funeral on April 9, the funeral cortege drove past Warrington Hospital where he volunteered and hundreds of NHS staff applauded him. We recorded the whole thing, so mum would be able to see it when she woke up. But the following day, she passed away too. It’s devastated the whole family.

My sister and I came across the Yellow Heart page recently and it’s so important because people need to hear the stories of the thousands who have died. I’ve created a poster with two yellow hearts, a picture of my parents and the hashtag #loveforthelost and the family have them in their windows. Groups like this are vital for letting relatives know they are not alone. I believe mum and dad were the first couple to die of it but I’ve since heard of more and I’ve reached out to them to say: ‘You’re not alone. We understand what you’re going through’.

MUM IS NOT JUST A STATISTIC

Pamela Fruhmann, 60, a former secondary school teaching assistant died on April 10 at Bournemouth Hospital. Her daughter Jessica Hayder, 31, a primary school teacher says:

Mum was loved by everyone. She was strong and sociable. She’d been through so much in her life and after she’d passed away we were overwhelmed by messages from people who knew her.

She’d been battling acute myeloid leukaemia but hadn’t been in hospital since October. However at the end of March she was readmitted to the cancer ward with a sore throat and a high temperature. At first, she tested negative for COVID. But then she deteriorated and was tested positive.

Pamela Fruhmann, 60, a former secondary school teaching assistant died on April 10 at Bournemouth Hospital

Pamela had been battling acute myeloid leukaemia but hadn’t been in hospital since October

I live in Vienna and the borders were closed so I couldn’t get to her. I would Facetime and both my sister Olivia and I would sing to her, telling her we loved her and that everything was going to be alright. We didn’t want her to know we were struggling or how serious it was. Thankfully, she really didn’t have much idea of what was going on.

I’ve struggled with the thought that my mum was alone at the end. I thought back to awful scenes of people having to say goodbye to their loved ones from a distance and suddenly we were in the same situation. I even had to attend her funeral by Facetime, reading out a poem as the minister held the phone up to the mourners.

I spotted the Yellow Hearts group a couple of days ago and thought it was amazing. To see how many other people have been affected has made both my sister and I feel less alone and I feel more connected to the UK. Just reading through the stories, people have lost parents, siblings, friends and they’re all ages. We’re all uniting in this horrible situation.

Pamela is pictured with her daughter Olivia (right) and Jessica (left) at a wedding

Pamela Fruhmann died last month aged 60. She is pictured in hospital

Olivia said: ‘I spotted the Yellow Hearts group a couple of days ago and thought it was amazing. To see how many other people have been affected has made both my sister and I feel less alone and I feel more connected to the UK’. Pictured is the yellow heart in her window

Olivia shared this sweet message on Facebook to thank the founders of the page

Everyone is extremely supportive, which is so vital at a time where friends and family can’t even be together.

On the day mum died, there had been 9,875 deaths and I remember thinking: ‘My mum is one of them’. But this group helps because she’s not just a statistic. We can all put faces to the numbers.

The hearts make people realise that it’s not just the old and sick who are dying and there is a reason for the lockdown and to be socially distanced. It’s raising awareness as well as giving support.

My sister has a post-it note heart in her window. We’ve also raised £4,700 for the leukaemia ward where mum was treated. She would have loved that.

DAD WAS DEAD WITHIN FOUR HOURS OF GOING TO HOSPITAL

John Ashwell, a retired pawnbroker from Hertfordshire, died on March 27 aged 70. He leaves his partner of 30 years, Jenny, 73, as well as three stepchildren and six grandchildren. His stepdaughter Sue Williams, 50, a company director, says:

John Ashwell, a retired pawnbroker from Hertfordshire, died on March 27 aged 70. He leaves his partner of 30 years, Jenny, 73, as well as three stepchildren and six grandchildren 

It’s the shock of losing John so suddenly which has hit the family so hard. You hear stories about people with COVID being on ventilators for weeks with this virus but John was taking into hospital at 11am and was dead by 3pm. I could hear the sirens of the ambulance rushing him to hospital. Next thing we get a call to say he’d gone.

John was one of those people who couldn’t sit still. He’d survived a stroke and cancer but was always on the go – he loved travelling, fishing and walking. He’d planned to go to Greece this year.

There was no indication that he was ill. He had no cough. The night before he died, he watched television, had some cake and went to bed. He was fine. But next morning he could barely breathe and was unresponsive. Mum rang for an ambulance and he was sedated.

The nurse who sat with him when he died told us that he wasn’t frightened, that wouldn’t have been aware of what was going on – which will be some comfort in the future. But we can’t get our heads around any of it.

It was my 23-year-old daughter Hannah who spotted the Yellow Hearts group. She’s a key worker and is devastated by what’s happened. Not being able to hug her or my mum or sister at John’s funeral was horrible.

Putting up the yellow hearts is a good way show how many people are being affected by this awful virus. You see people walking around in groups, thinking it won’t happen to them – but it does. The 37,000 people who have died are not just numbers – this shows how it is affecting people on a personal level. It would be nice to have some kind of permanent memorial with all their names on it one day.

BEHIND EVERY HEART IS A FACE AND NAME

Keith Sanford, a former football steward from Grimsby died on April 2 aged 57. He leaves his wife of 38 years, Eileen and three children and six grandchildren. His daughter Marie, 36, a nurse says:

Dad was the loveliest, friendliest person who would do anything to anyone. He was a joker too – the first time my in-laws met him one Christmas, he was dressed up as Santa after visiting his grandchildren. He had a fake parking ticket that he used to put on my husband’s car and he’d fool him every time!

Keith Sanford, a former football steward from Grimsby died on April 2 aged 57. Pictured, with daughter Marie

Keith is pictured with his wife Eileen and daughter Marie on her wedding day. She said he was the ‘loveliest, funniest man’ 

Keith, who had received an organ transplant, was in the high risk category. He is pictured with his grandchild

The window of Ketih’s children’s home is now marked with a yellow heart 

He was in the ‘high risk’ category as he was a kidney donor recipient but he’d done his best to shield himself. We have no idea how he caught the virus as he was so careful. He was admitted to the Diana Princess of Wales hospital at the end of March after he tested positive and we couldn’t to visit him at all. Despite that, we were in regular contact with him via video. But as he deteriorated, he was unable to take calls anymore. The staff on the ward would try to help him but his breathing was so poor, he couldn’t really say anything.

On April 2, the hospital rang to say he didn’t have long left and I could come to see him. I raced there but can only have been in the room for 30 seconds before he passed away. I do hope he knows I was with him. Outside, I heard nurses crying. As a nurse myself, I know how much pressure there were under. To lose one patient on a ward is hard but Dad was the fourth in a very short time. It must have been awful for them.

I can no longer listen to the daily briefing because Dad is a part of those increasing numbers, so when I saw the Yellow Hearts group, I joined it because behind every heart is a lovely face and a name and a story. That’s so important for the families, to be able to share the stories of their loved ones and for us to realise we’re not alone in our grief.

Source: Read Full Article

Here's Why You Can't Watch HBO Max on FireStick

HBO Max has just launched, and fans are excited about the chance to stream their favorite HBO classics alongside favorites like The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Friends, and the Harry Potter movies. HBO Max is also great because it can be viewed through many different outlets: the official website, the app, Hulu, YouTube TV, Apple TV, and so much more.

Unfortunately, the streaming site isn’t available on Amazon’s FireStick, and fans are wondering just what the deal is.

Subscribe to Men’s Health


SHOP NOW

Why can’t I get HBO Max on FireStick?

HBO is owned by AT&T/WarnerMedia, and while the company was able to make deals with a bunch of different platforms like Apple, Google, and cable companies in order to bring HBO Max to those outlets, Amazon and AT&T/WarnerMedia weren’t able to come to terms. Roku users are also unable to stream HBO Max right now for the same reason.

Decider reported that AT&T/WarnerMedia had been in a “heated” battle about distribution, and Amazon reportedly wanted to add HBO Max as a Prime Video Channel. Shortly after HBO Max launched, an Amazon spokesperson stated that:

“With a seamless customer experience, nearly 5 million HBO streamers currently access their subscription through Amazon’s Prime Video Channels. Unfortunately, with the launch of HBO Max, AT&T is choosing to deny these loyal HBO customers access to the expanded catalog. We believe that if you’re paying for HBO, you’re entitled to the new programming through the method you’re already using. That’s just good customer service and that’s a priority for us.”

However, all hope is not lost. Just like Marvel and Sony were able to come together to keep Spider-Man in the MCU, it’s entirely possible that Amazon and AT&T/WarnerMedia could strike a deal that benefits them both in the coming days or weeks.

Source: Read Full Article

Why David Bromstad from My Lottery Dream Home looks so familiar

Who is your favorite HGTV star? Do you prefer Fixer Upper‘s Chip and Joanna Gaines or are you partial to Tarek El Moussa and Christina Anstead from Flip or Flop? Do you love to watch the twins from Property Brothers, Jonathan and Drew Scott? Or are you a fan of David Bromstad, the star of My Lottery Dream Home, who is “one of HGTV’s busiest and most popular hosts,” according to the network?

“Bromstad had zero name recognition before coming on the airwaves,” according to a report in Star Tribune. However, after My Lottery Dream Home premiered in 2015, he “would get recognized once or twice a day. Now, whenever he’s in an airport, he can expect to be stopped 20 to 30 times an hour.”

While plenty of fans surely recognize the real estate savvy star from My Lottery Dream Home, you may also think that he looks familiar due to the fact that he’s been popping up onscreen ever since winning a popular HGTV competition.

David Bromstad has appeared on plenty of HGTV shows

Viewers can probably tell you all about David Bromstad’s ability to help newly rich folks purchase million-dollar abodes, thanks to his gig as the host of My Lottery Dream Home. But Bromstad first set himself on the path to fame (and fortune) when he won the premiere season of HGTV’s Design Star in 2006. Following his win, he served as a host on the show. Entertainment Weekly notes that he continued to “[contribute] to the show variously over its seven seasons,” while also making the most of the opportunity to become a star.

That’s why he appeared on Color Splash from 2007 to 2013, while also showing up on HGTV Dream Home Giveaway in 2007, both HGTV Showdown and The Ultimate Color Guide in 2008, and Behind the Magic: Disney Holidays in 2009, which was the same year he started on Bang for Your Buck. By 2010, fans could watch him on First Time Design, which was followed by Best Places I’ve Ever Been: Disney Memories in 2011.

Things were still rolling along in 2015, which was a year filled with Beach Flip and DIY Insider, as well as HGTV Insider, and the premiere of both My Lottery Dream Home and Brother vs. Brother, before Home & Family came in 2016.

So, if you think that you’ve seen Bromstad somewhere before, it’s likely that you’ve seen him a lot of places before — that is, if you watch HGTV.

Source: Read Full Article

Nasa boss explains why yesterday's launch didn't happen

Nasa chiefs have said the SpaceX launch that was scheduled for Wednesday had to be delayed over concerns that the launch could trigger lightning.

Looming rain and thunderstorms meant that the first launch of astronauts from US soil in nine years had to be aborted just minutes before lift-off.

Robert Behnken and Douglas Hurley were due to travel to the International Space Station (ISS) on a rocket and capsule system built by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk’s firm SpaceX.

An estimated 1.7 million people from around the world tuned in to the launch from The Kennedy Space Centre in Florida.

However as the weather conditions continued to worsen, Nasa and SpaceX decided to ‘scrub’ the mission for safety reasons, less than 17 minutes before the Falcon 9 rocket was due to take off.

Nasa administrator Jim Bridenstine said the decision was made because there was ‘simply too much electricity in the atmosphere’.

He added: ‘There wasn’t really a lightning storm or anything like that, but there was concern that if we did launch it could actually trigger lightning.’

‘I know there is a lot of disappointment today. The weather got us.’

The launch date has now been moved to Saturday at 8:22 pm UK time.

Mr Bridenstine added: ‘But I also wanted to say this was really a great day for Nasa it was a great day for SpaceX. I think our teams worked together in a really impressive way, making good decisions all along.

‘We have a lot to look forward to. In just a few short days on Saturday afternoon we are going to do it again.

‘Here is what we know – we are going to launch American astronauts on an American rocket from American soil. We are going to do that. We are very close.’

While the conditions were improved shortly after the launch was scrubbed, the teams went ahead with the postponement because the launch window was instantaneous, which meant the spacecraft would have had to leave on time to rendezvous with the space station.

Mr Behnken and Mr Hurley had to remain strapped in their seats until all the fuel in their rocket was unloaded and the emergency escape system was disarmed.

Before exiting the Crew Dragon capsule, Mr Hurley, who is the commander of the spacecraft, said: ‘We could see some raindrops on the windows and just figured that whatever it was, was too close to the launch pad at the time we needed it not to be.

‘Understand that everybody’s probably a little bit bummed out. That’s just part of the deal.’

British astronaut Tim Peake said it was a shame that the SpaceX launch was scrubbed but added ‘the rules are there in the interest of safety’.

The mission, named Demo-2, would have seen SpaceX become the first private company to send astronauts into space.

Since ending its Space Shuttle programme in 2011, Nasa has depended on Russia’s space agency Roscosmos to transport its astronauts to the space station.

In 2014, Nasa awarded SpaceX and Boeing contracts to provide crewed launch services to the space station as part of its Commercial Crew Program.

According to Nasa, the aim of the Demo-2 mission to show SpaceX’s ability to ferry astronauts to the space station and back safely.

It is the final major step required by SpaceX’s astronaut carrier, the Crew Dragon, to get certified by Nasa’s Commercial Crew Program for more long-term manned missions to space.

Source: Read Full Article

Here Are 7 ’13 Reasons Why’ Season 4 Theories That Fans Should Hope *Aren’t* True

13 Reasons Why is coming to an end, but before it does, there’s many questions that need to be answered. Of course, fans have been speculating about what will happen in these final episodes for almost a year, and these 13 Reasons Why Season 4 theories show they’re anticipating a lot of heartbreak to come. If the most loyal fans are correct, one beloved character will die, another character will receive justice, and Clay will go through it this season.

13 Reasons Why‘s final season premieres on June 5, and will find the Liberty High kids preparing for the next chapter in their lives. But, as hinted in the Season 4 trailer, their graduation festivities are ruined by Winston, Monty’s secret lover and alibi who wants to uncover the truth behind Bryce’s murder after Monty was successfully framed. The gang must continue to conceal the truth while still dealing with their own problems and traumas, from addiction to relationship issues. Even fiercely loyal bonds — like Clay and Tony — are being put to the test.

These kids have been through enough, but if these fan theories hold up, things are about to get much worse before they can move on for good.

Justin Will Die

In what would be one of the most sad and disappointing character arcs on the show, many fans on Reddit are predicting that Justin will die in Season 4 after succumbing to his addiction problems. Unfortunately, this twist might have been foreshadowed as far back as Season 1, when Justin and Jessica dressed up as Sid and Nancy at the school dance, and Clay reminded them of how their story ends (with both of them dead). And in Jessica’s senior yearbook picture, posted to 13 Reasons Why‘s Instagram page ahead of Season 4, Justin calls her Nancy and signs off as Sid. While it likely won’t play out as tragically as the real couple, Clay may have foreshadowed his new brother’s fate years ago.

Monty Is Actually Alive

Season 3 ended with the shocking reveal that Monty was killed in prison after he was arrested for sexually assaulting Tyler and then framed for Bryce’s murder. But his death was never actually shown onscreen, and was only revealed to Ani by Winston, who is seeking justice for Monty. Many fans think Winston could’ve been lying in an attempt to rile up the gang and make them reveal the truth. Hey, people have done much worse on this show.

Clay Will Attempt Suicide

Clay has had a rougher time than arguably anyone else on the show, save for Hannah, and that looks to continue in Season 4, as he works with a new therapist on his mental health issues. In the new trailer, he looks to be possibly experiencing a psychotic break, with hallucinations of him in prison, as he’s haunted by Bryce and Monty. Many fans predict that his trauma and guilt will lead Clay to attempt suicide. But in a full-circle moment, they think he will recover and be able to begin anew.

Clay Is Behind The "Monty Was Framed" Graffiti

The Season 4 trailer opens with red graffiti on the Liberty High walls stating, "Monty was framed," spooking Clay and Justin. The trailer would have you believe that Winston, who is attempting to unravel the truth behind Bryce’s death, was responsible for the move. But some fans suspect that it was actually Clay who vandalized the walls, as a physical manifestation of his guilt for keeping secrets. Season 2 does prove that Clay is fond of graffiti, so it’s not too far-fetched.

Tyler Will Be Arrested

Season 3 closed with the reappearance of the assault rifles that Tyler almost used at a Liberty High dance before being detained by Clay and Tony, who threw the guns into a lake. Ani told Deputy Standall in Season 3 that Tyler was preparing to shoot other students, and he could very well find the guns. Granted, the officer does cover for his son Alex, who actually killed Bryce, so he’s not above letting Tyler get away with it. But still, don’t be surprised if he ends up in handcuffs either.

Zach Will Die

In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, showrunner Brian Yorkey teased that Zach’s Season 4 storyline is "really interesting" and goes to places that he had not expected. So of course, fans immediately started to decipher what that meant, concluding that he is in a really dark place this season, specifically concerning alcohol. Some fans are betting that Zach either dies or does something absolutely terrible that’s very unlike his usual character. Is anybody safe on this show?

Bryce Made 13 Tapes

In what would be a full circle moment fo the show, fans are speculating that Bryce left behind 13 tapes of his own before he died, where he apologized to each main character. This theory doesn’t seem to hold up considering that Justin Prentice (Bryce) isn’t a main cast member this go-around, and this season will comprise of only 10 episodes rather than the usual 13.

The theories may vary, but one thing remains the same: this season will definitely be more dramatic than any season before.

If you or someone you know is experiencing suicidal thoughts, call the National Suicide Prevention Hotline at 1-800-273-8255 or text HOME to the Crisis Text Line at 741741. You can also reach out to the Trans Lifeline at 877-565-8860 or the Trevor Lifeline at 1-866-488-7386, or to your local suicide crisis center.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Sutton Stracke claims she was demoted on ‘RHOBH’

“Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” newbie Sutton Stracke almost got a coveted diamond but says she was placed in a “friend role” at the last minute.

The 49-year-old began to film as if she were a main “Housewife,” but says producers ultimately demoted her to part-time after her ex-husband, Christian Stracke, got involved and prohibited filming with their three children.

“My ex-husband just was adamant that they could not film with me and I totally get it,” she told Kate Casey on her podcast, “Reality Life with Kate Casey.” “It was hard. It was a hard blow because, you know, it’s exciting to do. And I wanted also viewers to see me with my kids and me at home. And it’s the softer side, I think, of all of us. When you get to see all of the ladies at home with their kids and their families, it’s kind of like, you know, you don’t they don’t show that much of it. It’s clearly not that interesting. But it’s the soft underbelly of who these women are. And I’m sorry that we can’t see that this season.”

Sutton and Christian tied the knot in 2000 after meeting as teenagers and reconnecting later in life. They divorced three years ago and are parents to daughter Porter and sons Philip and James.

Christian is a managing director at PIMCO, the same investment management firm where “RHOC” star Gina Kirschenheiter’s ex-husband Matthew Kirschenheiter used to work. The company is known for its strict no-media policy, which could be why the Stracke kids are not on the show.

Sutton explained that she still joined the show regardless to give herself a purpose after her divorce, saying: “I needed to be a role model for my daughter. Like come on, get yourself together and start doing something for yourself to make her proud. And actually, my boys, too, they always wanted to know what I did all day. And it was like nothing. Like go to the gym. I don’t know. I didn’t have like a real purpose besides taking care of them. So it’s been fun to watch them watch me and then the show came up at this really opportune time and I think I finally had the guts to do something like this and take a risk.”

Source: Read Full Article